Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

Absolutely not. I am pushing neutrality.

And if you find my libertarian leanings expressed on drug threads, you will find that I am for conservative curbs on federal power over person freedom but not for handing out free needles and drugs.

Both recognition and suppression of homosexuality are essentially religious views with no place in government, while heterosexual marriage has secular, practical and universal exclusive bases, which I could go into explicit detail you would rarely find elsewhere.


97 posted on 02/22/2010 10:27:11 PM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (IN A SMALL TENT WE JUST STAND CLOSER! * IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Absolutely not. I am pushing neutrality.

Nonsense, you are striving to move me, freerepublic, the GOP, and America to the left.

103 posted on 02/22/2010 10:37:15 PM PST by ansel12 ( (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

The way the human “beast” is, unwelcome homosexual come-ons are considered a particularly grave form of sexual harassment. Bandy about the word “homophobia” all you want, that’s the nature of the beast. “Will you be my sex partner” is NOT the egalitarian equivalent of “Will you be my wife/husband.” “Will you date me” doesn’t work the same across the divide either.

Once we have run up against a cold hard Fact about humanity, we can either respect it, or go on a quixotic quest trying to change it.


106 posted on 02/22/2010 10:40:14 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Both recognition and suppression of homosexuality are essentially religious views with no place in government,

How wrong you are. Government must protect the innocence of children. Instead, the liberal establishment has put its entire weight behind destroying their lives at the whim of careless mothers, seducing them on the taxpayer's dime, pimping them to the powerful media and entertainment lobbies, exploiting them by handing them over to social experimentation by degenerates and abandoning them to a future of debt and privation.

301 posted on 02/23/2010 4:14:06 PM PST by Albion Wilde (Liberals love the poor so much they came up w/ a plan to create millions more of them. - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

RE: “Both recognition and suppression of homosexuality are essentially religious views with no place in government, while heterosexual marriage has secular, practical and universal exclusive bases, which I could go into explicit detail you would rarely find elsewhere.”

Let me see if I am reading you right here -are you suggesting religious views have no place in politics?

IF so -then who exactly makes the “this is a religious view to be censored” determination?

Further -last I looked Religion was protected by the Constitution while homosexual sex to be publically embtaced as normal and rewarded by society was not... In other words we the people can make laws that restrict things that are not God given and inalienable and or specifically guaranteed by the Constitution...


336 posted on 02/23/2010 9:58:28 PM PST by DBeers ( †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson