[DesertRenegade]

“I don’t care if gays want to be conservatives. I’m ok with that. But they need to be conservative.”

Exactly. I have nothing against homosexuals who want to support Conservative politics. But there are already dozens of legitimate groups which have been fighting for lower taxes and less government bureaucracy - and these groups have existed for decades. Why in the world would a group of homosexuals form a political interest group based on what they do under the sheets? That right there sets off a lot of alarm bells.

[Eagles6]

“Zactly.

[RedMDer]

I guess they want legitimacy and have access to common property etc.
As far as the common property is concerned, they could always have written a contract. So, I guess it comes down to the legitimacy and acceptance. Ok, I accept that they are there. Don't shove it down my kids and grandkids throats. We get it. And in the meantime we're the bad guys if we promote our heterosexual lifestyle?

[The Future 2012]

Is there any other “GOP” group named for its sexual habits?

The SwingerProuds?

The Shacking UpProuds?

The BigamyProuds?

The AdultererProuds?

The MasturbatorProuds?

The PornLoverProuds?

No. Although probably many folks at CPac are divorced, have or may commit adultery, or may be living with a significant other.

What’s the difference? IT’S NOT THEIR REASON FOR LIVING. They are in pro-2nd amendment contingents, or pro-military groups, or pro-life groups, or whatever.

It’s always the homosexuals who have to organize around their sexual habits.