How does that disprove the theory? If we knew those things, there wouldn't be any need to theorize about them. You seem to be expecting to establish a Catch-22 that says you can't theorize until you already know.
The evolutionists elevate their theory’s and worship them as reality. What I say to them is just dont expect everyone else to.
Next is that the whole origins consideration isn’t science to begin with.
It’s philosophy.
Nobody was there to observe it. It can’t be tested on. It hasn’t been repeatable.
Assembling molecules in the lab qualifies as science, but is not terribly relevant to the origins debate.
Nobody knows for sure what conditions were like. They’re presumed based on what scientists think they needed to be in order for x,y,z to happen.
That’s not science, that’s guessing.