>> he showed the increase under Bush as an elevating line then he showed Obama and the line goes straight up <<
Another dubious indication of Glen’s analytical powers? Seems to me he’s implying it’s not 0bama’s fault that the line turned straight up — it’s Bush’s fault.
I don’t know how you got that since he clearly says “and then after Obama is elected and starts spending this is the line”... and he shows it going skyward.. no indication Bush is in any way responsible.