--------------
I view Mark as more of the college professor and Glenn as the Middle/High School teacher.
Different types of presentations to their respective audiences.
Look at the sorry state of affairs that is our so-called “educational system” and how little of our actual history is taught. How little, if anything, many students know of the Constitution.
If folks can learn from Beck as opposed to Levin, I’ll take that over them learning nothing. It should serve to at least whet their appetite for more.
I don’t watch Glenn too much, listen to Mark whenever I can, have read Liberty and Tyranny.
The point I’m trying to make I guess, is that there is room for both as long as their purpose is to inform/educate about the original liberties and constitutional values we conservatives hold dear.
Fair enough.
Beck made some interesting historical points in the CPAC address. For example, Woodrow Wilson, like Obama, was pushing an unpopular "progressive" (anti-constitution) agenda, so Wilson decided that he needed more speeches, thinking that the problem was "the message" instead of his policies that the public hated.