Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reagan Man
I am agnostic on Paul. I loves some of the things he says and other things I think he makes good points but I am not sold on. It seems when people disagree with Paul's foreign policy it is on strategic grounds not philosophical ones. Namely if we do what he says we will be in more danger in the short run. I think his philosophy is that you don't do things that make you safe in the short run that will ultimately make you less safe in the long run. Also, it is not right for the leaders of one nation to pick and support the rulers of another. You said...

Truth is, Ron Paul's foreign policy agenda is straight out of the Democratic Party playbook. When Paul says that they attacked us on 911 "because we're over there", he's deadwrong. The Islamic religion opposes the US (western culture) because it opposes our way of life and our unalienable rights to freedom and liberty.

What is your evidence for that? I can give you lists of evidence to the contrary. Hundreds of terrorists have said time and again why they attack us and it is not what you just said. They intend to bring back the Caliphate. We support secular and less fundamentally Islamic regimes in the middle east. We have a western outpost in Israel. The regimes we support are very difficult to topple. We are the road block to their success in their goal of uniting the muslim nations of the world. That is why Israel is little satan and we are the great satan. Ron Paul is not incorrect as to the motivation of our attackers.

One can argue that Paul is wrong because we need to be in the middle east to prevent the extremists from toppling moderate regimes and reviving the Caliphate which would ultimately be more dangerous to us.

20 posted on 02/21/2010 2:00:56 PM PST by nitzy (A just law does not punish virtue nor reward vice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: nitzy
Your post is confusing the issue, if not the debate. I'm not sure what you're point is. I don't disagree with you about the Caliphate, moderate Islamic states or the huge historic factor of Israel. May be if you read or reread what I posted in #19, you might sound more lucid.

Specifically, the part about what the Dey of Algiers TOLD Jefferson and Adams in 1786 in London. The Islamofacists want to spread Islam and the word of Mohammad. They want all infidels to become Muslim. Nothing has changed in the 200 years since Jefferson or for that matter, since Mohammad walked the Earth some 14 centuries ago.

21 posted on 02/21/2010 2:21:58 PM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson