To: Erik Latranyi
IIRC the basis for that ruling was the Commerce Clause, even Clarence Thomas sided with it.
Very disappointing to say the least.
I hope he doesn't go the same way here.
18 posted on
02/21/2010 10:07:42 AM PST by
Las Vegas Ron
("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM where are you?)
To: Las Vegas Ron
No. Thomas voted in the dissent. Scalia in the majority.
82 posted on
02/21/2010 4:11:14 PM PST by
Clump
(the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
To: Las Vegas Ron
There is no Second Amendment protecting Pot...
89 posted on
02/21/2010 9:34:56 PM PST by
TXnMA
(D'Aleo re Hansen's "GISS" temperature database: "Non Gradus Anus Rodentum!")
To: Las Vegas Ron
IIRC the basis for that ruling was the Commerce Clause, even Clarence Thomas sided with it.Thomas got a federalism case wrong? This I gotta see. Which case?
124 posted on
02/22/2010 6:50:22 PM PST by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson