Posted on 02/21/2010 6:01:04 AM PST by bayliving
You must be an Al Sharpton fan. He also screams “bigot” against anyone who disagrees with him. If Paul is an anti-semite, it is odd that he has too biggest heroes are too Jews, Ludwig Von Mises and Murray Rothbard.
ALL BS
Rule For Radicals ; instead of sending people out to oppose an event send out so called supporters who are dressed up as KKK racist in support of the candidate you wish to destroy. (Gay conservatives and support Loon ROn Paul in poll)
And if you believe this was a poll of actual conservatives, please see Hussein for one of the blue pills.
>The Paul haters are having a very bad morning. They need to >get used to it.
What color is the sky in your world?
In 2012 Ron Paul will be 77 years old. Nuff said.
Haven’t you heard? 77 is new 67.
Hey....I know you're having a bad morning but calm down and have some decaf.
Yeah right. I am 67 and I don’t feel like I did when I was 57.
Yep.
Be that as it may... in 2012, Rand Paul will be only 49.
And in case you didn't notice already -- over at Horowitz's blog they are having a fit, an absolute fit, over new rumors leaking out that Sarah Palin is going to be "upping the ante" on her endorsement of Rand Paul, and is coming to Kentucky to go full-bore campaigning for Rand.
Personally, I'd be thrilled to see it.
There are a lot of people having “fits” this morning, aren’t there? LOL
There are a lot of people having “fits” this morning, aren’t there? LOL
I don’t know Rand but I do know Ron and if Rand is a chip off the old block than I am against him.
I’ve looked into Rand a bit. He seems far saner than Ron (who, BTW, is perfect as where he’s at - where his foreign policy lunacy can do little harm). Most of the attacks on Rand seem to be “sins of the father” style.
Now, Rand has plenty of time to prove me (us?) wrong, but I think your post makes some sense...
Won’t work, sorry. Absolute free trade means both parties have to be all-in. Pulling back into our borders and not protecting our allies is a recipe for disaster. Brought us 911. The Soviets would be in control of 90% of the world if that had been our policy. Wake up.
Yeah you are right. Ron Pauls are on par with the Founding Fathers while yours (and good many Republicans) is on par with liberal President Woodrow Wilson.
Yes Ron Paul is a real Radical just like the Founding Fathers.
He believes in Borders, language and Culture.
Amnen!
Rand's foreign policy is really not that much different than Ron's, in terms of "pre-emptive war" or "unilateral action". Those who want to believe that Rand is likely to be an Interventionist Republican in the manner of the Bush family are going to be sorely disappointed, IMHO.
About the only real difference I can see between Ron and Rand in terms of foreign policy, is that Rand seems maybe a little more willing to commit a robust response to a deliberate attack than Ron might be.
In other words, from what I can tell, Rand is no more likely to start a war than Ron would be; but, he might be a little more likely to finish one.
“In other words, from what I can tell, Rand is no more likely to start a war than Ron would be; but, he might be a little more likely to finish one.”
Sounds about right. From where I sit, that’s a good thing, isn’t it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.