[Lazamataz]

No, the for loop is okay. He's got an array length limitation. My problem with his code is he doesn't use the much-more-convenient List<> Generic with the built-in IEnumerator and the fact he uses array elements instead of Objects. Furthermore, every new congressional spending effort requires a full redeploy, because the vallues are hardcoded. I'm using data instead -- add a record and BANG there's another lie. Much easier.

Besides: Where's the object orientation? Why a console-app in this WWW world?

C++'ers. Every time. They think the world is a monochrome CRT and forget how to use objects. That's why we C#'ers took over. :)

[ProudFossil]

No, the for loop is okay. He's got an array length limitation. :)

True, he does have a limiter, i.e., the length of liberal lies. But that limiter is continually growing faster than the computer can evaluate it to reach the limit. After all, the computer can only work at the speed of light while the liberals are lying at quantum speeds. And so it will be never ending. He should put a qualifier on the limitation such as liberal.lies before the year 300 AD in order to have closure within the next century or two.

[calex59]

Well, C++ is the father of object oriented programming, one of the first(if not the first)and C# and Java are it’s offsprings. Can’t pat C# and Java on the back without giving C++ credit for the development of both those languages, AND it runs faster than either of those languages, both of which are bogged down in a virtual machine. Just the opinion of an old, retired programmer.