Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mengerian

I think you have misinterpreted my comments. The democrats loaded-up the defense bills and bills to fund our troops knowing that President Bush would have to accept the bills in order to keep our troops funded, which added to what Glenn calls “Bush’s spending.”


88 posted on 02/20/2010 10:25:18 PM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: onyx

Fair enough. I interpreted your comment as President Bush eagerly desired and pined for war. I now see you meant the spending authorization bills to keep the troops funded. Mea culpa.


92 posted on 02/20/2010 10:29:16 PM PST by Mengerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

To: onyx; Mengerian
The democrats loaded-up the defense bills and bills to fund our troops knowing that President Bush would have to accept the bills in order to keep our troops funded, which added to what Glenn calls “Bush’s spending.”

It's basically how DC works.  Until the president gets a line item veto, this sort of crap of loading defense appropriations bills with irrelevant garbage will continue.

Take a look at it from Bush's POV, if he had vetoed the defense appropriations bill because of irrelevant spending tacked to it, he robs the troops of needed funding.

141 posted on 02/20/2010 11:19:28 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper ("Ked Tennedy would have been plowed... I mean, proud today..." - Senator Max Baucus (Drunk-MT))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson