Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rich Knight
There's nothing wrong with that package. The issue remains ~ should homosexuals and their enablers be BANNED from being part of the leadership elite of the Republican party?

I believe it's a necessity if we are to get enough votes to control the legislative bodies in this country so that WE set the legislative agenda and the Democrats are left to get drunk and mess around.

Once you control the legislative agenda you can move on to more important issues ~ e.g. finding a cure for homosexuality, development of palliative care drugs for people suffering from Liberal delusions, permanent employment for the unemployed, higher savings rates, even lower taxes, rolling back regulation to 1790, fixing the Supreme Court, annexing Canada (at least the good parts), and getting rid of Fidel Castro.

Just keep in mind that history shows that when Republican homosexuals act out we lose votes. No one cares what the Democrats do ~ they're just a bunch of trashy people anyway.

Social Security and tort reform are going nowhere as long as the public votes the way it does, so let's figure this out ~ no homosexual acting out among Republicans obviously requires no homosexuals in the leadership roles!

996 posted on 02/21/2010 6:04:09 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 960 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

Will you let dragons into the village just so long as they promise to never act like dragons?


997 posted on 02/21/2010 6:10:45 AM PST by Rich Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 996 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson