Then rewrite what you posted so that it is consistent with the thrust of the points.
NOTE: The post concerned the narrow argument earlier that Conservatives do stuff that make homosexuals into wild pople running around nekkid.
My argument is that they've been doing that for thousands of years ~ not our fault.
No thanks, I am not gonna abide by your directives and re-read, re-think, re-post or whatever else it is you want me to do. Your post was directed to both me and another poster, but responded to the post that the other poster made to me, after culling a tiny portion of my post and responding to that small bit of it.
Your post seems to suggest the historical accuracy of this odd vision you have of homosexuals at all points in history running around “nekkid”, and doing that of their own volition, their behavior having nothing to do with those
in their environs whose animosity goaded them into that kind of behavior. Well, first of all, is that just a metaphor? Where or when is it or was it in the civilized world (we’re not talking about ‘nekkid’ primitive tribes,are we?) that the homos parade around ‘nekkid’?
(or partially naked)
except , say, at Gay Pride Parades,in Rio during Carnaval
(where they’re likely to be mixed in with more heteros),or at their own private parties, out in public where they know their PDAs will be taken as a kind of provocation that straight PDAs are never taken as? If you think the above-described types constitute the majority of either gay or lesbians you’ve got some extra research and observation to do.Maybe you could start with Dick Cheney’s daughter, but she’s only one among hundreds of thousands.
If you don’t understand the concept of ‘the dialectic’ then of course you won’t grasp that one far-out fringe component of one group is ‘acting out’ precisely to provoke what they perceive as the far out fringe component of the other group.
These two groups NEED each other to keep up the polarization, to keep the issue “hot-button”, rather than cool-button, and they want to keep it that way-————
because that way is SIMPLE.And politically useful to both ‘sides’.
Answer me one additional thing-—why, oh why would these obstreperous, dangerous members of GOProud (who I frankly have never heard of before today)want to fight to belong to the GOP, when they would seemingly have a warm welcome and a permanent home in the Democratic Party, who still believes it owns them, just as it’s always beleived it’s owned American Blacks, lock stock and barrel?
Why, oh why, would that be?
Uhhhh, perversion?
Now maybe you could respond to some TINY part of MY statements, because I’m giving you a hundred times what you’re giving me.