[eddie willers]

But it is quite another to tacitly approve of degenerate behavior by welcoming them with a level of respect

So....you're calling for the pitchforks?

I can give a hoot what any adult does as long as they are not interfering in the rights of others.

I will abide no 'special rights', no radical agenda, and would stridently be against public displays of affection or flaunting of an 'alternate lifestyle'.

But a peaceful, liberty loving, 'live and let live' member of society is certainly welcome.

[DesertRenegade]

“I can give a hoot what any adult does as long as they are not interfering in the rights of others.”

OK, so you are a Libertarian, not a Conservative. It’s called CPAC for a reason.

[whatisthetruth]

But a peaceful, liberty loving, 'live and let live' member of society is certainly welcome.

Well they certainly were willing to let Sorba have his peaceful, liberty loving say, now weren't they. Typical leftist homo fascists now masquerading as conservative and they can't even do that well.

[daniel1212]

If you know much of anything about the homosexual movement, then you would know that they will not simply be against higher taxes, but against those who do not promote of homosexuality as healthy.

“Live and let live” requires a commitment to traditional morality that agrees with the Bible, and a “conservatism” which is really libertarianism will result in just the opposite of the latter.

[BP2]

I will abide no 'special rights', no radical agenda, and would stridently be against public displays of affection or flaunting of an 'alternate lifestyle'.

But a peaceful, liberty loving, 'live and let live' member of society is certainly welcome.

Ya know ... I'm fairly "live and let live" person myself.

However, in terms of acceptable Societal Norms, the majority has to draw a line somewhere.

I think NOT SUPPORTING a lifestyle that does NOT promote the continuation of the human species is a pretty good line to draw.

The slippery slope argument may be overused, but it's true nonetheless ...

Unchecked, this:

is normalized to this:

Until it becomes SO NORMALIZED that it becomes a part of regular Societal Norms
and is even acceptable to have people in positions of leadership promoting the lifestyle,
like Obama's "Safe School Czar" Kevin Jennings:

[LomanBill]

[I can give a hoot what any adult does as long as they are not interfering in the rights of others.]

 

 

What do you call forcing the rest of us in the health insurance pool to pay for the abomination of nature via their procreative abuse of medical science - the creation of sperm from female stem cells, for example?

 

You're being a Useful Idiot. 

 

1. Ideological subversion is the process which is legitimate, old word, and open. You can see it with your own eyes.  All American mass media has to do is to "unplug bananas" from their ears, open up their eyes,  and they can see it.  There is no mystery.  

 

It has nothing to do with espionage. I know that espionage intelligence gathering looks more romantic.  It sells more deodorants through the advertising.  That's probably why your Hollywood producers are so crazy about James Bond types of films. But in reality the main emphasis of the KGB is NOT in the area of intelligence at all.

 

According to my opinion, and the opinions of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85% is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, active measures, or psychological warfare. What it basically means is: to change the perception of reality of every American that despite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.

 

It's a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is divided into four basic stages.

 

The first stage being "demoralization"....

---KGB Defector Yuri Bezmenov, circa 1984

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2095202/posts

 

Step. Away. From the PC Kool-Aid.

[nina0113]

I can give a hoot what any adult does as long as they are not interfering in the rights of others.

Shouting down an invited speaker would seem to interfere with his freedom of speech. Next year it'll be pies.

[Ol' Sparky]

I can give a hoot what any adult does as long as they are not interfering in the rights of others.

If they are influencing others to engage in behavior that is detrimental to society, they diminish the quality of life for everyone in it.