>And so long as speakers are discussing the harm of homosexuality, we need to encourage that, just as we need to continue to discuss the harm divorce causes to our children, adultery and sexual immorality, pornography, and the sexualization of women cause in our society.<
This is one of their polemics, and it is a false dichotomy, as people are not marching on churches etc. in protest against their stand against adultery, or porn, or using psychological tactics against them (”pornophobic”?) It is the same leftist ideology that promotes homosexuality that stands against these other issues, and the reason the homosexual activists draw heat is because of their aggressive promotion, and the cooperation of powers that be.
If partaking of the Lord’s supper (a consensual act) resulted in the death of a half a million Americans as AIDS has, due first to homosexuality and the rest to promiscuity in general, then what do you thing the reaction wold be?
That said, i am not for name calling and the gross vulgarity, but for their salvation. Yet i am forced to resist the promotion of homosexuality, which will destroy many.
I am also opposed to the promotion of homosexuality. I just don't think that politically we can be the party that hates homosexuals. I think there is a difference between the two, and I think we can condemn the homosexual agenda without condemning homosexuals for their personal choices.