Here, have a piece of fruitcake.
Posted on 02/19/2010 7:35:34 PM PST by DesertRenegade
Ryan Sorba, from the Young Americans for Freedom organization’s California chapter, was booed off the stage tonight at CPAC, for deriding CPAC’s choice to have GOProud attend CPAC, even going so far as to say he “condemns CPAC”. Not the sort of thing one would say when invited to speak at the biggest gathering of Conservatives who look to CPAC for guidance and networking.
(Excerpt) Read more at rightpundits.com ...
“...Looks like Palin has pretty good political instincts...”
Some of the posters in the McLame/Palin threads from the last week or so may disagree with you on that one.
:-)
WTF? I don’t accept the homosexual lifestyle. I abhor it. I don’t want it shoved into anyone’s face. I don’t want homosexuals persecuted but I don’t want their illness normalized.
You have a real problem. Are you sober?
It isn't anger, it is righteous indignation at what occurred at CPAC and the homosexual activists that apparently were in control of that session that booed Ryan Sorba.
There is also justifiable animosity at those who would attempt to infiltrate the conservative movement and marginalize those here who don't want anything to do with their homosexual agenda -- homosexual "marriage," "gay adoption," corruption of young children with public school sex propaganda and public displays in outrageous parades, and passage of "rights" legislation that is an affront to all Christian peoples. Etc., etc.
Can you understand/comprehend the difference?
Looks like this may be someone who wants to incite the site...everyone was sooo afraid that “trolls’ were arguing in favor of homosexuality. I think the real trolls are like this, someone who uses all this ugly words to incite the site.
They are mentally ill, so I feel sorry for them mostly.
I have my opinion and you have yours. I’m not banned and neither are you.
You have a problem with any of that?
Of course I can understand the difference.
so how about you save your anger for people who behave badly or want an agenda that is not good..instead of Freepers who want to discuss what the issue means politically and how to deal with it.
I didn’t answer you well enough.
I would roll back every single solitary piece of legislation or court order promoting, condoning or protecting any and every aspect of the homosexual agenda.
Happy now?
Let me know if he answers you.
;-)
Here, have a piece of fruitcake.
He hasn’t recovered sufficiently.
[Reagan] also said this: ““Whatever else it is, homosexuality is not a contagious disease like the measles. Prevailing scientific opinion is that an individual’s sexuality is determined at a very early age and that a child’s teachers do not really influence this.”, in opposition to “prop 6”, a proposition to ban gays from teaching in schools.
You might care to note that Reagan---he was speaking when asked to endorse Proposition 6, prior to his second shot at the White House---declined to endorse the measure on these grounds as well, and I am quoting him directly (from Human Events, if I remember correctly): It is not needed---we have that protection now. What if some youngster distraught by bad grades accuses a teacher? Innocent lives may be ruined.
In some quarters today that would get Reagan denounced as, if you'll pardon the expression, a closet gay liberationist.
The Constitution states as its own crowning purpose: “To secure the Blessings of Liberty to Posterity.” The Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendments forbid the taking of innocent human life. The Fourteenth Amendment also explicitly requires the States to provide for the equal protection of the laws for all persons.
Abortion is unconstitutional and therefore unlawful nationally and at the State level. If the states won’t fulfill their constitutional responsibilities, the officers of the national government have a sworn duty to do so. It isn’t “either/or,” it is “all of the above.”
The protection of unalienable God-given rights is the premise upon which our republic and our liberty are built. If the building is sagging, look to the foundation first. It’s where you’ll find the problem.
By the way, you didn’t answer my question: “Do you apply this “logic” to other unalienable rights, or just to the supreme right, the right to life?”
Do you think the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is up to the States? Free Speech? Freedom of the Press? Parental Rights? What?
Yes, I am sober. Do plan on having a couple of glasses of wine with tonight’s steak. Thanks for asking.
Do you believe a gay couple living together should be allowed to execute a power of attorny giving each other the power to make medical decisions for each other- against the rest of the family’s wishes?
You've "implied" your own implication.
Pray tell - HOW do Kevin Jennings and other Gay fascists get to infest, control, and subvert the agenda of the NEA, public schools, the government, the military, the "entertainment" industry, and other companies like Disney and Google?
So if you had total power in the US what would you do with all the gay folks?
I'd put them in charge of the Dept. of Interior Decorating.
Come on, don’t be shy. What law would you pass?
A law that specified ONLY they could be your proctologist, food handler, teacher, cop, and King.
Will and your "partner" be having flank steak?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.