Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

Pretty small crew for a 14,000 ton displacement. I think somebody added a Zero somewhere. Sounds more like a patrol craft in conception. I’m guessing 1,400 ton displacement. Looks small, too.


43 posted on 02/19/2010 9:18:02 AM PST by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tallguy
"Pretty small crew for a 14,000 ton displacement"

No doubt. I'm sure this is an error by the brain dead journos at AP. Ship displacement is always quoted in long tons. By comparison, the new Littoral Combat Ships are somewhere around 3K long tons. There's NO WAY this "destroyer" (apologies to real destroyers everywhere) is any heavier than the littoral ships, which are some 70 feet longer.

45 posted on 02/19/2010 11:13:28 AM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson