Rush Defends Sarah Palin's Choice to Campaign for McCain

The Economy Colapse ^ | 1/16/2010 | Rush Limbaugh

[Brices Crossroads]

Rush Limbaugh on the Tea Party movement the Republican party and the conservatives Sarah Palin her Daytona beach appearance and McCain. Rush Limbaugh says that Sarah Palin is not a Tea Partier , she is a republican first and foremost, Rush Limbaugh believes that Sarah Palin owes McCain the fact that she is what she is today and that it is a payback time for her to McCain , it is an obligatory payback says Rush Limbaugh.

[ohioWfan]

There's the nasty name-calling rule breaking mk, back in form again.

I knew you were just faking it when you played nice (sort of), but I thought I'd encourage you anyway.

Oh, well......

[mkjessup]

You live for it oAf. In fact you THRIVE on it.

Your entire schtick is the continual playing of the victim card, and your antics are talked about (and laughed about) even beyond the borders of FR.

Not that it’s anything you should take pride in, lol

[ohioWfan]

LOL! I ain't no victim.

Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.

I got your number the first time you went on the attack, and I won't fall for it again.

In fact, every time I read one of your pathetic, impotent posts, I chuckle.

I have no doubt that you and your fringee buddies talk about me elsewhere. I consider it a badge of honor to be mocked by angry outcasts.

[mkjessup]

The day has not dawned (nor will it) where you ‘have my number’ on anything.

As for your egotistical belief that I (or anyone else here on FR) waste time discussing you in any way, shape or form, nothing could be further from the truth.

You’re just not worth it.

You do know how to selectively mash that abuse button however.

Now put on the faux indignation and innocence routine and say “who, me? oh *I* didn’t do that!”

Sure.

[fortheDeclaration]

Palin owes nothing to McCain.

She has no business supporting McCain in a primary against a real conservative.

[ohioWfan]

Ummmm.........you TOLD me I was talked about outside of FR. Can't you even tell the same story from one post to the next?

You see, that's the problem with lying, mk. You have to try to remember what you said last time. Telling the truth is a big advantage.

Now I have come to the conclusion that you and I don't disagree much about politics. It's just that you are a nasty person who likes setting traps, playing games, and being mean.

I've got your number, and you won't beat me again, because your game is so transparent and weak.

And for the record, in case anyone is reading mk's deceitful drivel, the "abuse button" thing is entirely fantasy. He and his buddies just made it up and they won't let it go. It doesn't hurt me one bit because it's so ridiculous, but it sure does make the gang look like fools. Why should I post abuse against mk? He's a joke.

Now, mk. Since you have once again stunk up the room with your presence, I shall depart. There were good conversations before you got here, but you have messed the thread up, as per your custom.

Now go donate to J.D. and start acting like a conservative.

[fortheDeclaration]

I agree with Rush’s take on this. She would run again as an “R”. She is returning a favor. If McCain loses, she will endorse JD Hayworth. I suspect JD knows all this too.

Gee, isn't that 'big' of her!

Why doesn't she wait until after the primary and just endorse the winner?

[Anti-Bubba182]

Palin is doing the right thing in supporting McCain, a bit. She would look like an ingrate if she did not. She doesn't have to be married to this either. A speech or appearance or two and she can be on her way.

[mkjessup]

Ummmm.........you TOLD me I was talked about outside of FR. Can't you even tell the same story from one post to the next?

In my post #362 (one of the few posts of mine which has NOT been selectively deleted for one reason or another) I said:

Your entire schtick is the continual playing of the victim card, and your antics are talked about (and laughed about) even beyond the borders of FR.

NOTE: I never said that *I* or any one of my fellow FReepers were the ones talking and laughing about you, YOU made that assumption all on your own.

You see, that's the problem with lying, mk. You have to try to remember what you said last time. Telling the truth is a big advantage.

In your case, TWISTING the truth is an even greater advantage but again, it's just another demonstration of your one-trick-pony persona.

Now I have come to the conclusion that you and I don't disagree much about politics. It's just that you are a nasty person who likes setting traps, playing games, and being mean.

Which proves that you know absolutely nothing about me at all. You have created that mental image in your mind so that you can justify whatever you wish to spout off with.

I've got your number, and you won't beat me again, because your game is so transparent and weak.

Thank you for revealing your inner motives and thoughts, you have created this non-existent 'contest' in your mind, you crave some undefined future moment in which you "beat me" for whatever reason you feel the need. I think you need some serious help.

And for the record, in case anyone is reading mk's deceitful drivel, the "abuse button" thing is entirely fantasy. He and his buddies just made it up and they won't let it go. It doesn't hurt me one bit because it's so ridiculous, but it sure does make the gang look like fools. Why should I post abuse against mk? He's a joke.

Playing to the imaginary crowds again. Pompous protesting right to the end. You are innocent as the driven snow (cough-cough-snicker).

Now, mk. Since you have once again stunk up the room with your presence, I shall depart. There were good conversations before you got here, but you have messed the thread up, as per your custom.

Take another look, you have employed your usual victim-scam, engaged in your own name calling while condemning it in others, your oh-so-predictable hypocrisy in action. Physician heal thyself.

Now go donate to J.D. and start acting like a conservative.

Pay attention, I told you I've already donated to J.D. (and will again) in post #352. Oh wait, that's one of the posts that you (har har) did NOT mash the abuse button on.

Of course your insulting posts are allowed to remain.

So much for 'stinking up the thread. Take a look in the mirror.

[Lakeshark]

Holy crap.

I have no idea what the argument is here, but you're just so bitter and crazy I can't comprehend why you think this is the right place to have hissyfit after hissyfit.

I sort of remember you claiming to be a Christian in some thread far back. Is this really how you're supposed to carry yourself?

[aMorePerfectUnion]

“Why doesn’t she wait until after the primary and just endorse the winner?”

You are asking a question that requires knowledge of what
is in her mind. I don’t do mind reading.

It may be as simple as a display of class and graciousness.
Rush thinks so. It may be the return of a favor. Rush thinks
so. I have no certain knowledge.

If McCain lost the primary, she wouldn’t have a chance to
graciously return a favor. Who knows?

Maybe she already called JD and talked personally to him -
he indicated he understands.

Actually, I think it is big of her to return favors and
show class and grace. But that’s me...

best,
ampu

[mkjessup]

Holy crap.
I have no idea what the argument is here, but you're just so bitter and crazy I can't comprehend why you think this is the right place to have hissyfit after hissyfit.
I sort of remember you claiming to be a Christian in some thread far back. Is this really how you're supposed to carry yourself?

Direct some of that righteous indignation at ohioWfan while you're at it.

And as the saying goes, you really don't have a dog in this fight, now do ya Sparky?

[Lakeshark]

I really don't have a dog in the fight.

Just thought you might want to dial it back a bit, particularly as you both claim to be some kind of Christian.

I've had my spats with ohiofan before, just never got to the intensity level of this. Have at it if you want, it just seems a bit over the top.

[mkjessup]

I don’t know what you feel is so ‘intense’ about the exchange, I’ve been called a ‘malicious, dishonest blasphemer’, and I suppose neither ohioWfan NOR the mods consider that ‘name calling’, another poster who has been around long enough to know better was more than eager to start throwing around homosexual innuendo, that was apparently deemed ‘ok’ by the moderators, in fact the thread clearly demonstrates that any and all insulting posts made by ohioWfan are perfectly ok, any comments that I have made are subject to deletion.

Of course oWf denies emphatically that she would ever hit the ‘abuse’ button, which begs the question “why would someone hit ‘abuse’ on a post of mine responding to ohioWfan, if it were not oWf herself?”

I guess the dog did it. LOL

[Man50D]

Your comment about “nobody put a gun to Palin’s head to support a...socialist” is silly.

It would be silly to claim someone did put a gun to her head. McAmnesty is a socialist. You seem to have that "silly" refrain down pat.

If you don’t get why she supported him, you live in a fantasy world.

Oh I understood a long time ago why she supported him in 2008 and supports him in 2010. It certainly isn't because she disagrees with him on a majority of the issues.

[Man50D]

Try to get Man50D to name the party that he wants you to vote for, he won’t say their name, but he does know that he doesn’t want anyone voting Republican.

Yes ansel, that is the popular reply among OPers when you lack any cogent content and try to deflect attention from the fact this is the second time Palin is supporting her socialist buddy.

[Lakeshark]

Whatever. I'm not a mod and don't even know where the abuse button is (just kidding.....I've never hit it......do I sound like Lazmataz?). The story must be interesting.......

Next time can we just do the thread topic, okay?

[Man50D]

Palin endorsed McCain out of loyalty for what he had done to bring her to national attention.

Party over principle. Thank you for reiterating my point.

You're making far too much out of this than exists.

You're right. So what if Palin is endorsing a socialist sympathizer over a much more Conservative candidate! That's the Republicrat way!

[rbmillerjr]

“Oh I understood a long time ago why she supported him in 2008 and supports him in 2010. It certainly isn’t because she disagrees with him on a majority of the issues.”

LOL.

You’re a funny guy.

[Sarah-bot]

You have made the most honest post on this thread. This entire thread is composed of one group of people who want Palin to succeed and others who think Palin is standing in the way of their the success of their pet politician.