That litany of things he knows will not happen all at once is of no use.
"All at once" is your criterion, maybe you should use it.
"Unimpeded by government" can mean vastly different things to different people.
You have no choice but to say it, you think our corporate tax rate isn't high enough, and that lowering it did not spur growth.
What? Not enough H1Bs? Too many? Too many state required employee overheads? What regulations? What's he talking about?
Seeing that this is a conservative website, you have a minimum level of understanding of economic cost. You appear to believe that costs are merely things to be funded.
Lol, here we have the weakest, lamest tactics used on FR by one of the weakest, lamest debaters. So, you propose to tell me what I really think? Did you get that information from the Psychic Hot Line? Sorry, I don't think corporate taxes should be raised. I do think there is a point of diminishing returns where lowering them further will not spur more economic activity or more revenue to the government. Not sure where that rate is, but some who think lowering taxes is the answer to all problems begin to sound like the libs who say spending more and more on education is the solution to all problems.
And, yes, VDH is very long on generalities and short on specific solutions.
Seeing that this is a conservative website, you have a minimum level of understanding of economic cost. You appear to believe that costs are merely things to be funded.
A pathetic dodge to very specific and relevant questions. And stop your amateurish tactic of trying to tell me what I actually think. I'd put my background in knowing how costs are actually met up against anyone posting here.