To: SeekAndFind
What if the answer is “neither,” since evolution is bunkum?
2 posted on
02/17/2010 8:18:59 PM PST by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
To: SeekAndFind
3 posted on
02/17/2010 8:19:52 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: SeekAndFind
"Raptors look quite a bit like dinosaurs"
Think of the works of an artist. It is common for works of the same artist to look alike.
It is not that dinos and birds have a common ancestor, but that they have a common designer. That is why they resemble each other.
For example: These pots and pans look alike not because they were produced in a chronological sequence, but because they have the same designer.
4 posted on
02/17/2010 8:22:26 PM PST by
garjog
(Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
To: SeekAndFind
9 posted on
02/17/2010 8:37:04 PM PST by
null and void
(We are now in day 391 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: SeekAndFind
“THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED!”
.... wait ...
13 posted on
02/17/2010 8:51:52 PM PST by
bajabaja
(Too ugly to be scanned at the airports.)
To: SeekAndFind
What you are reading here is nothing more than an arcane debate between traditional taxonomists and cladistic taxonomists. The simple resolution lays in the observation that birds are dinosaurs in the same sense that marsupials are mammals.
Under a cladistic taxonomy, the Classes of Aves and Reptilia get rearranged. The dinosaurs are removed from the reptiles and classed together with the birds in a new tetrapod Class called Dinosauria.
Problem solved.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
