What interested ME was how everybody was talking like Hayworth was the 2nd coming of Reagan, and how Fred Thompson was wrong for not seeing that.
So my focus was on reasons why Fred Thompson might not be as willing to endorse Hayward as others here want him to be. And why Sarah Palin may not have been so willing to endorse Hayward as others here want her to be.
Obviously anything I say that makes Haywood look less than perfect would improve the comparison between Haywood and McCain. But I'm not going to let that stop me from responding to those who are attacking Thompson.
From your comment: You also made this ridiculous unsupportable statement I take it that you agree with me that Haywood isn't really Reagan. But that you don't think people here were treating him as if he had no flaws. But if that is ttue, why are you so upset that I pointed out the flaws that you seem to think everybody else is NOT ignoring?
Or do you actually think Haywood is the 2nd coming of Ronald Reagan? That's not how I read your comment, but maybe you do. In which case my attempt to convince you otherwise has provoked a predictable response.
Hayworth is not the second coming of anyone. He is in the first generation of Tea Party candidates.
What's important here is:
A. Hayworth is the choice of We The People
B. McCain is the pink slip recipient of We The People
Those like-minded will endorse in that fashion. Those that endorse RINOs are on the wrong side of the fence by their own free will. The lines are being drawn. Looks like Sheriff Joe and Mark Levin are leading the conservative endorsement force.
So my focus was on reasons why Fred Thompson might not be as willing to endorse Hayward as others here want him to be. And why Sarah Palin may not have been so willing to endorse Hayward as others here want her to be.
Funny. You didn't say a word about any of that. Interesting that you give different false names for JD too and continue on with your phony baloney "second coming of Reagan" meme.