Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FTJM

then it should be decided by the courts and not a bunch of websites


4 posted on 02/15/2010 2:20:47 AM PST by ari-freedom (Gong hey fat choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ari-freedom

That and DNA.

Who does this guy think he is?


6 posted on 02/15/2010 2:24:24 AM PST by rambo316 (Take Back America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom
then it should be decided by the courts and not a bunch of websites

The courts are not in charge of everything, in fact, their unconstitutional role in elections is already too big.

This issue was decided by a special Joint Session of Congress on January 5, 2008, with Richard B. Cheney of Wyoming presiding.

That was the legal, constitutional venue for hearing this issue. Any Member of Congress or any Senator had the perfect right to raise this issue, which had been fully discussed, here and elsewhere, beforehand.

None did, and President of the Senate Cheney signed the papers.

End of story.

45 posted on 02/15/2010 4:09:50 AM PST by Jim Noble (Hu's the communist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom
then it should be decided by the courts

According to the Constitution, the courts don't get to remove presidents. Only the congress can do that. Even if the birthers really came up with the goods, the Supreme Court would merely cite Article I and toss the case over to Nancy and Harry.

141 posted on 02/15/2010 1:57:34 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson