This is pathetic rationale. Regardless of Obama’s eligibility, just because someone is trusted by the majority does not automatically liberate that someone from the constraints of law."
Exactly. He's trying to make the argument that our government, our very Constitution (& laws), are built upon mob rule.
Well, seeing what's going on in this country since Mr. untouchable was selected, with the way our so called Congress has been acting...perhaps we really have devolved into mob rule.
>> He’s trying to make the argument that our government, our very Constitution (& laws), are built upon mob rule.
LOL, you said it better.
>> perhaps we really have devolved into mob rule.
The future guarantees forms of discouragement and encouragement, but when I think about Christ and the Constitution, I’m confident Liberty will prevail regardless of how.
By his rationale, Gore had no right to sue in the 2000 election.