Replies

To: Springfield Reformer

Post 56 makes my point perfectly, it was the proper response and I was correct, the people did not know that the poster was a third party chairman, which explains his posting striving to defeat his opposition, the Republicans, and advance his formal agenda as the actual leader of a "third party".

To: EternalVigilance; CajunConservative; ReyTurner

The RINOs who run the Republican Party love the attitudes expressed on threads like this one. Y’all are helping pave their way back to power.

Some people here may not realize that you also run a political party, and it isn't the Republican party.
The fact that you are the Party Chairman for a competing political party, would explain your agenda on this thread.

56 posted on Saturday, February 13, 2010 7:54:41 PM by ansel12

172 posted on 02/13/2010 10:18:56 PM PST by ansel12 (Mitt Romney and the Romney family traditionally, is at war with conservatism and traditional America)

I’m not sure who runs the party - see #337 and the surrounding conversation at this old thread:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2059761/posts?q=1&;page=251

All this time, no explanation

173 posted on 02/14/2010 12:01:43 AM PST by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.) (RIA)

I didn’t expect you to see my point. Conversation over. Again. See ya next time. :<

193 posted on 02/14/2010 10:08:26 AM PST by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794