To: Pollster1
Guys...
width=600 is a good idea in an IMG tag.
That creep is fat enough without 1124 x 1440 magnification.
28 posted on
02/13/2010 4:24:33 PM PST by
annalex
(http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
To: annalex
Well you are just one guy and that is your opinion.
You may want to develop an overwhelming consensus that is unassailable, despite your proof of the obvious. /s/s/s/s/ :\ LOL
49 posted on
02/13/2010 4:46:51 PM PST by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
To: annalex; Pollster1; Vendome
Even better, reduce it down to 640x480 before posting.
Using the width and height attributes of the img tag just makes the browser work harder by making it do the reduction. Result, more wasted bandwidth.
Free photo reduction software.
66 posted on
02/13/2010 7:15:19 PM PST by
upchuck
(The horse is in the pasture. The barn door is wide-open. Obama wants to know who made the hinges.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson