Posted on 02/13/2010 4:35:42 AM PST by Daisyjane69
I’m not sure I believe the part about the pin...I’d have to see a pic.
I did expect a reply to the several inquiries to this post to clarify what you meant (typo, etc). But nothing. So I looked at your other responses on this thread and then also found a Is John Mackey a potential Presidential Candidate? thread.
IMHO, you have had many 'strange' posts (sorry). But this may be the best (strangest?worst?funniest?)
LEAVE JIM ROBINSON ALONE! (in accordance with FR rules, this poster is pinged since their name is mentioned (snicker))
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Including me in your response makes no sense to me.
Why are you pinging me?
I didn't know the part about the pin she wore.Nor did I.
From www.carolineglick.com:
...Asked how Obama can win reelection in 2012, Palin responded, "Say he decided to declare war on Iran or decided really to come out and do whatever he could to support Israel, which I would like him to do."EXCELLENT!And if that still isn't enough, there is her lapel pin.
The politician who leads the populist opposition to Obama decided to make her most important speech since the 2008 election wearing a pin featuring the US flag and the Israeli flag.
I would like to see a photograph of her wearing that pin.
I am sorry for that. I made an assumption that you would understand why. You posted and received a reply from sarah-bot on one of the two threads on my post. I am sorry for bothering you.
mkjessup? Wasn't Jack Nicholson's character in a "Few Good Men" named Colonel Jessup?
Sarah-bot had some strangest posts I’ve ever seen on Free Republic.
Wonder what was going on.
Thank you MaryFromMichigan for coming to the rescue of a drowning man (me)! ;-)
Quite all right, FRiend!
"I have always been a supporter of Patreaus, and I think he would make a great vice President. The reason I do not want Patreaus as President is because he is a function. I do not want a function as President, I want a relation a President. I want my president to give two possible answers to any given question. I do not want Sarah Palin to be a function, I want her to be a relation."
Actually I believe I did understand the post in question, the difference between someone being a ‘function’ or a ‘relation’ was an attempt by the poster to differentiate between someone who is reactive, ‘functioning’ in a highly structured (military) manner, as opposed to someone who is a ‘relator’, i.e., someone who can ‘relate’ to the concerns and fears of the public, without the rigid, uncompromising sort of thinking that some Americans (but not this one for sure!) assign to those who are part of the military leadership.
The flow of logic was a little skewed, but I think that is what the poster was trying to convey.
No problem. I responded to Sarah’s post and she decided not to reply. End of story.
Be well.
Do you have an interpretation?
Paranoid-schizophrenic with delusions of adequacy.
.
.
.
accurate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.