Your strong rhetoric would imply a 'strong' case against Ms. Fiorina. Ironically; much of analysis at the link you provided, surrounds McCain's candidacy and his own questionable - dubious? - Pro-Life MO. That you use Sarah as well; as an arbiter per your challenge; when she in fact, is campaigning for McCain - and is 'proud to do so'; seems; on your behalf; just a bit contradictory or. . .perhaps hypocritical; or just a mistake (regardless, of Sarah's depth of commitment which we surely, all do know).
It is a bit much; in light of above; for you to challenge me for using names of both; in same sentence/breath! Doing so; surely stretches the conversation here.
Your link served up the following:
(excerpt)link
In June 2008, Fiorina assured a group of politically active women (reported in some outlets to have been discontented Clinton supporters) in Columbus, Ohio, that John McCain “has never signed on to efforts to overturn Roe vs. Wade.” Why would a pro-lifer regard this as a positive attribute to be touted? Why would a pro-lifer sign on as a surrogate for that sort of candidate?
More to your point; perhaps you should first, or at least, as well; ask Sarah. . .
. . .link cont:/
We are therefore presented with the strange spectacle, in 2008 and since, of Fiorina proclaiming her pro-life sentiments for the first time, even as she amassed a record of publicly delivering a series of cues to the contrary.
Sarah's commitment (versus Fiorna's cues) carry the greatest weight,of course; but that is not even the debate; save, that is, for your making it one.
Autry? Who is Autry?
I’m hoping to be able to vote for your candidate if I have to, I really don’t know why you are trying so hard to annoy the pro life crowd and draw them into exposing her weakness on the issue.
I don’t know why you want to open this can of worms by continuing to drag Sarah Palin’s name in with Fiorina.
Why start a pissing contest between supporters of a famous pro life champion and someone that, let’s say, isn’t.