[cricket]

Well, fitting ‘you’ is fine; it’s your vote. But if we all vote only the perfect candidate per our persuasion; not sure whom would win that one. Finding the ‘greaster good’ amongst a few; is a challenge; but by same token; we do not want the lesser man/woman to succeed; particularly when our Country is in crisis. IMHO.

(Am not voting in Californina; and don’t know whom I wouild support if I did; but would note again, in only for correction; that Carly Fiorina is not pro abortion; much less; avidly so. Do know, whomever is Repub Party choice; I pray they win!).

[SoConPubbie]

Well, fitting ‘you’ is fine; it’s your vote. But if we all vote only the perfect candidate per our persuasion; not sure whom would win that one. Finding the ‘greaster good’ amongst a few; is a challenge; but by same token; we do not want the lesser man/woman to succeed; particularly when our Country is in crisis. IMHO.

Quite an extrapolation on your part.

Dis-ingenuous probably.

I stated one issue that is a deal-breaker for me and you equate that with me looking for a 'Perfect Candidate'.

Not hardly!

As I've stated elsewhere and as others have stated (UPSDriver on this thread), it's a matter of character on this issue.

If you are supporting the killing (murder) of an unborn child, what aren't you willing to support?

What promises are you unwilling to break?

What other moral issues mean nothing to you? Gay marriage? How about child abuse?

If I cannot count on you to protect the most weak and defenseless in our society, how can I count on you for anything else?