“Neither the designer nor the means of design are [not?] addressed. There is no supernatural involved.”
However, the Republican appointed Judge in the Dover case did come to the conclusion that ID was being used as a stalking horse for religion, thus the decision to refuse ID equal standing with science. Furthermore, the religiously oriented people who pushed the case made fools of themselves by lying on the stand. Something which seriously annoyed the Judge. It was also shown that previous creationist literature had been basically rewritten by replacing the more religious wording with ID.
You mean the political hack whose main claim to fame before being appointed a federal district judge was heading the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board and banning Bad Frog Beer because he didn't like the label?
You mean the wise jurist who let the ACLU write his decision almost word for word?
David Souter was Republican appointed too. I guess you must think he's a great judge since he was on the Supreme Court and all.