Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Science has tremendous credibility precisely because it follows rules, is statistically verifiable, and can be reproduced.

How does Geology and Paleontology fit into this? Yes, certain rules are followed, but how is it statistically verifiable and reproduceable?

I agree that the natural world should be studied as a closed system even though I don't believe it is, however, if scientists are going to refrain from drawing conclusions of ID, they should also refrain from drawing conclusions of not ID, based on these studies. ID exists precisely because of the latter. Also, science needs to admit that it knows very little, compared to all that there is to know, and it will always be that way. A little humility would help credibility.

18 posted on 02/09/2010 3:59:56 PM PST by HerrBlucher (Jail Al Gore and the Climate Frauds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: HerrBlucher

Amen.


28 posted on 02/09/2010 4:10:55 PM PST by Josephat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson