Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jacksonstate

There is a large difference in the two services.

There is also a difference in the total lack of privacy.

It is very rational and very logical. The sole reason for this administration to foist homosexual practitioners on the military is for the campaign donations to the democrats. This is a social experiment that has no place in the us military.

homosexuality is ONLY about recreational sex. The military forbids forms of recreational sex conduct. no adultery and no fraternizing with the lower ranks. homosexuality is a recreational behavior not an imutable trait.

This whole exercise is just a backdoor way of imposing the junk science of “born that way” upon society in general.


121 posted on 02/11/2010 4:07:02 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory

You know, back in the 1940’s and 1950’s when the services were being integrated, similar arguments about that decision were floated as evidence of a failed idea. Today, we don’t give it a second thought.

If you deny people the right to a domestic agreement then you force them into a world of “recreational sex”. How dare we give people no alternative but “recreational sex” then condemnt them as somehow “not serious” because they only have “recreational sex”.

I guess Henry Ford should have held all drivers of black cars in disdain in 1915 even though the only color car he was offering was black. I gotta tell you its lame to box people into corners and then tell them that people who decide to be in corners are inherently bad. People who do this are commiting violence against others. VIOLENCE.


124 posted on 02/12/2010 7:21:47 AM PST by johnnycap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

To: longtermmemmory; jacksonstate; Grizzled Bear; wagglebee; DirtyHarryY2K

Excellent points.

Homosexuality is wrong.

There’s no way that homosexuals should be permitted to serve in the military on their conditions of being able to do it *openly*.

Nobody is saying that homosexuals can’t serve their country and defend it, but they need to leave that part of their lives out of it.

None of this *serving openly in the military* crap when they are in a situation where same sex living arrangements are required. It’s bad for morale and if their sex lives are nobody’s business, like they keep claiming, then they need to stop making it everyone’s business by flaunting it.

I don’t doubt that our society will reach the point of Sodom and Gomorrah before Jesus returns, but no matter how they try to make it legal, it will never make it right and it should be fought as long as possible.


134 posted on 02/12/2010 8:36:35 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson