Not in the beginning because they wanted a whole party, and proving that Obama was not eligible and dems were in collusion to keep those facts hidden destroys....not just marginalizes that party.
Keep in mind the first case was brought up by a Hillary camp lawyer. They were hoping that the issue would have been taken up by the press before winning the election causing him to bow out and Hillary left as winner.
Now the thought of Obama being proven ineligible means huge repercussions for their party for decades to come.... So lets see the proof, it does not harm Republicans if he is proved eligible they just followed the law, either way it has harmed dems.....they don't supply proof they look shady until they do and causing more and more to question them. If they do prove it then the questions of why have you waited and any dirt no matter how small will now have everybody interested in it and will not blow over.
Either way dems have played this one poorly....their last risky hope are marxist propaganda tactics demonizing the group bringing it up....but has that group grown to large for it to work???? I think so if over half of us think something is wrong there, they have lost the battle.
Carville and Begala were not secretive about their plan to make it all about Starr. And they were very successful to the point that by the time the proceedings made it all the way through the Republican controlled congress, they just wanted it to all go away. The Republican leaders in the Senate threw Henry Hyde under the bus.
Once it was in the hands of the politicians, public perception triumphed over truth and law.
Excellent response, thank you.