Federal Court: No, the Government May Not Prevent Further Discovery of the Takeover of AIG

biggovernment.com ^ | 02/05/10 | Frank Gaffney

[American Dream 246]

Islam is very quietly taking over, with the big help of Obama - in the government - in the “civil” cases of terrorists - in the corporations - everywhere... That’s what’s going on. So quietly that we hardly notice it. Only when it will be too late.

[Cindy]

“What IS going on in our country?”

Creeping sharia.

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/creepingsharia/index?tab=articles
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/creepingshariah/index?tab=articles

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/sharia/index?tab=articles
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/shariah/index?tab=articles

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/sharialaw/index?tab=articles
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/shariahlaw/index?tab=articles

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/lawfare/index?tab=articles
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/libeltourism/index?tab=articles

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/shariafinance/index?tab=articles
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/shariahfinance/index?tab=articles

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/shariacompliant/index?tab=articles
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/shariahcompliant/index?tab=articles

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/shariabanks/index?tab=articles
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/shariahbanks/index?tab=articles

[Cindy]

Releated Link:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2436413/posts

“SEC mulled national security status for AIG details”
Reuters ^ | January 24, 2010
Posted on January 24, 2010 5:05:33 PM PST by Jet Jaguar

[Cindy]

sp=related

[unkus]

I call 0bama a “bastard” quite often and have never heard an objection. If the shoe fits.....

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

Thomas More legal team would not take a case that was, as you say, ‘stoooopid.’ They wouldn’t waste time on a case that didn’t have merit. Thomas More, ACLJ, and other Constitution Defending Attorneys ROCK! If you have an extra few dollars, please contribute to them.

This is very interesting. A federal judge ruled that the plaintiff has standing to conduct discovery on the AIG takeover because AIG supports Sharia law (and Sharia law would establish a religion if it had the power).

[Thumper1960]

Well.....*I* am not sure where he was “born” and I’m not sure if he’s even certain of his parentage.

[JasonC]

There is no crime in any of it. Just a sensible public policy is a time of crisis. The attempt to criminalize it is as obscene as prosecuting Marines over Fallujah.

[JasonC]

No, see I'm me, the man in front of you, not your let's pretend sack of straw. And you obviously have no arguments. Run along now, the adults are talking.

[JasonC]

Yes, they would, because they have. They are morons and deserve to be laughed out of court.

[JasonC]

Let's not and say Obama did.

It is simple to make modest adjustments to entitlements and public spending, and to have a functioning and profitable capitalist financial system. If the right wants to lay its claim to power on its dedication to burning capitalism to the ground in order to save it, then it won't get power ever again and won't deserve any.

As a fact, however, the populist know-nothing set will be excluded from all serious decision making on any of it. They are too stupid and reckless to be let near practical responsibilities. If they energy and hysteria help put conservatives in power, fine, well and good. To actually listen to and act on their raving idiocies, however, would be as suicidal as the left has been over health care.

Go to the broad American people and tell them your platform is to shut down all the banks as evil and immoral and unsustainable. Promise them soup kitchens and poverty as far as the eye can see, and tell them it will be virtue. And you won't get to first base.

[JasonC]

I fully support the AIG bailout in every respect, and I deny it has cost the treasury or the taxpayer a dime. Why would I compete with morons assailing it for establishing Sharia law? One they are morons. Two Sharia law has precisely nothing to do with any of it, it is simply the desperate smear of hysterics. Three, it was an entirely successful policy that has benefited everyone.

[JasonC]

I do not "heart" Obama, it is a silly statement and yet another reckless smear by the know-nothing idiot crowd. I am a Reagan republican and always have been, and every policy I have supported here came from George W Bush. I am also an optimist on the United States and capitalism and the future of both. I think the doom mongering hysterics terrified of Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank and Al Franken are the most pathetic whining cowards in the history of the right. When men tell me we are all doomed because of a pack of unimportant halfwits like that, I know they haven't got one vertabrae to their name in the entire crowd.

The modern left doesn't scare me. The state of the economy today doesn't scare me. Joe Stalin with atom bombs, slightly worrisome. Pelosi Frank and Franken couldn't scare a newborn hamster. An anybody who thinks we are living in a desperate trying time in which the fact of the republic and humanity hangs in the balance, doesn't have the sense of proportion God gave squirrels.

It is a trivial recession. It is one lost election after two terms marred by policy errors and an unpopular war. Get a freaking grip people, and man the hell up...

[antceecee]

Screw you Jason C... (emphasis added).

[hoosiermama]

woo hoo! I can hardly wait....More coming soon.

[bigheadfred]

It is a trivial recession

Yes. DO man the hell up. Put your billions where your mouth is and financially support the 8.4 million people who have lost their jobs until they can get back to work.

Otherwise, screw you, Jason C.

[Renderofveils]

You might deny that it has cost a dime of taxpayer money, but you'd be wrong. The initial $85 billion of taxpayer money went where? AIG doesn't have it. They paid £14.1 million LAST YEAR for their contract sponsoring Manchester United! They had to hold their hands out for $37.8 billion in a second bailout. Tell me again where the $85 billion went and how that didn't cost us? Deny all you want, but the facts are on the other side of the fence.

[sodpoodle]

Wondering if the Marxists are planning to confiscate the trillions of dollars held as Life Insurance Reserves. If, in fact, they are still *real money*.

Does the FED Reserve report includ all the Employer Benefit GROUP LIFE INSURANCE? If those benefit programs are replaced or taken over by the Federal Government - what happens to the Life Insurance premiums/reserves?

http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/current/accessible/l117.htm

[KTM rider]

"Yes, they would, because they have. They are morons and deserve to be laughed out of court."

If the US governent for instance bailed out Hospitals operated by the Catholic Church, at huge benefit in religious and political power and wealth to the catholic church, would that not violate constitutional law ?

oh yeah, I almost forgot, the constitution has a different meaning to liberal thinkers

[stephenjohnbanker]

“This is very interesting. A federal judge ruled that the plaintiff has standing to conduct discovery on the AIG takeover because AIG supports Sharia law (and Sharia law would establish a religion if it had the power). “

Man, that is bizare.