Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SZonian
Of course, I thought that was all evident. But the government is scoring everything the same way in the tables I posted.

I was actually happy that grunt compensation has come so far since my day. I would be happier still if they returned the old GI Bill to todays fighters.

But the issue here is not the warriors, it is the leeches.

187 posted on 02/03/2010 9:43:43 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07

I wasn’t sure if it was understood. I tried to backtrack through yours and KCtankers posts to see. I decided to post that info for anyone who may not have understood.

I don’t qualify for the “new” GI Bill. Got caught up in the VEAP BS and because I had enlisted through a Career Advisor overseas, all of my paperwork was jacked up from the beginning.

Do I have some sour grapes about that? You bet. I’m one of a very small percentage that the DoD and Congress has refused to make redress for.

As for the current folks in uniform, it’s good to see them receiving good pay and benefits. Although, many still feel it’s not adequate. There are jobs that have extra compensation for risks involved, but IMO, it’s not enough.

Paying an E-1 or any other rank the same amount across the board is not right. An admin clerk should not receive the same as an infantryman getting shot at. I know they get hazardous duty pay, etc., but they are voluntarily taking on extraordinary risks that the REMF is not and should be paid accordingly.


196 posted on 02/03/2010 9:56:22 AM PST by SZonian (I see people who claim they are victims of "hatred" and say we should be more "productive".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson