Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: throwabrick

Probably. But I’m not sure that is the best strategy. We have a strong Conservative slate for governor. Creating a third party movement at this moment instead of trying to do a Reagan grassroots take over and driving a stake through the heart of the Combine ought to be the goal. The Tea Party movement can be a catalyst in this. Putting a lot of energy into a third party only for one race (Senate) would undermine the effort to take over the state party by conservatives. We have an opportunity. We might fail, but we would be foolish not to try. And I don’t see how making the Senate race a three-way race helps. The time to defeat Kirk was in the primary. Accept the fact that he won because the best candidates went for the governorship and go with our strengths.


130 posted on 02/02/2010 10:20:25 PM PST by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: Houghton M.

Well, I agree with most of what you say.

Still, I will NOT vote for Kirk the jerk in November!

A Conservative candidate that can come forward for the November election will get my vote. When the “train-wreck” that is Obama and the demotard party that is becoming increasingly unpalatable to regular tax-paying voters derails this year. A Conservative who dared to run will (I believe) look very Scott Brownish!

I hope the Republican powers that be in Illinois, choke!
It needs to be fundamentally restructured.

Splitting my vote. For the ConservativeRepublican Governor ticket and for a Tea Party ConservativeSenator.


138 posted on 02/02/2010 10:32:50 PM PST by throwabrick (Zer-0 doesn't know what to do! Saul Alinsky never wrote about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson