Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zebrahead; fieldmarshaldj
No rational person can say a guy who votes with you some of the time is WORSE than a guy who will vote against me 100% of the time.

zebra, reasonably speaking, you surely understand the importance of having a united caucus in Congress? Even one Republican Senator who will cross over to support Obama on key issues would give him cover to say that he's being bipartisan, etc, etc, and be destructive to the Republican brand.

There's a good reason why people stopped trusting Republicans to be conservative! and that led to landslides for the Democrats.

The choice is between a divided and rudderless Republican Party with unreliable 50/50 (at best) votes like Mark Kirk, or a strong, united conservative Republican Party that voters can trust with a majority.

One 'Kirk' or 'Specter' isn't the end of the world, but there's never just one.

532 posted on 02/02/2010 8:15:39 PM PST by Crichton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies ]


To: Crichton

Zebra’s just reading from the party playbook, liberal ideology and corruption doesn’t seem to bother him. I find it amazing these guys who pop up on the threads on election night who’ve not participated in the hundreds of discussions beforehand, for whom would have a clearer understanding of precisely what’s been going on here, and why this was no victory for Conservatives tonight. The pig-ignorant stupidity of some is astonishing, especially on a politically-oriented Conservative website, and frankly, some of the comments are well into the trolling territory.


548 posted on 02/02/2010 8:21:21 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson