Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BP2

Look up the US Code - Mr. Obfuscation.


84 posted on 02/02/2010 12:15:56 PM PST by William Tell 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell 2

> Look up the US Code

LOL.

“Natural-born citizen” is no more defined in US Code than is
“to keep and bear arms.”

The latter wasn’t defined until the SCOTUS ruled on “DC v Heller” in 2008.

Are you using the Snopes or Fight the Smears defintion of “Natural-born citizen”?

That might be part of your confusion on this issue ...


86 posted on 02/02/2010 12:24:39 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: William Tell 2
Look up the US Code - Mr. Obfuscation.

There is nothing to look up. The term "Natural Born Citizen" does not appear in the US Code. "Citizen at birth" does, and the criteria for that have changed over the years. You think Congress can change the Constitution by passing a mere statute law? (The Code is merely the collection of currently in effect statutes).

But heck, you are the one saying "it's in there". Tell us where, section, chapter and paragraph. Then we can look it up. (Trust but verify, don't you know)

178 posted on 02/02/2010 10:16:15 PM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson