> Citizenship is defined there. You tell me where natural
> born citizen is defined.
Bwa-ha-ha !!!!!! The rest of us are laughing at you.
You don’t even know the difference, do you?
STRIKE ONE.
What’s your working definition of “Natural-born citizen”?
I don’t have a working definition of natural born citizen and neither do you. Don’t make the same fool mistake the other guy did quoting this US v. Kim Wong Ark case. It doesn’t say what the idiot birther website claim. It claims the exact opposite seem my post and post 109.
Every time you open your mouth you make a bigger fool out of yourself. All you do is try to mimic Rush Limbaugh with the Bwahaha stuff and repeat what the “birther” websites say.
BTW BP2 you never did answer my questions:
1- You tell me where natural born citizen is defined.
2- While you’re at it tell me why the Hawaiian government, numerous federal judges, and the McCain campaign not to mention numerous scholars are all in on this grand conspiracy?
Obviously your nonanswer is an answer.
I’ll say ..
Wong Kim Ark was not premised on his
citizenship status for eligibility to be
Potus and CIC.
As those of us who’ve been researching
this for more than 2 years know, there
has never been a SCOTUS case/finding
for a Potus natural born citizen eligibility
matter.