To: Reagan Man
Post 56 was to me. I saw it. I responded to it. It does nothing to change the fact that the Dems on the ethics panel roped McCain into their investigation for the sole purpose of covering their party's ass. The Keating Five should have been the Keating Four and that's reality.
Like I said...people who continue to push the Keating Five are either misinformed or dishonorable. And you've proved you aren't misinformed, sir.
72 posted on
01/27/2010 12:18:09 PM PST by
Mr. Silverback
(We're right, we're free, we'll fight and you'll see!)
To: Mr. Silverback
You need to pay atention. My first post was quite clear. JD Hayworth was cleared of any wrong doing in the Abhramoff scandal. Period. McCain was cleared of any impropriety with Keating, but publicaly criticized for poor judgment. Connecting Keating with Abramoff is a red herring at this point. Got it now? No should be defending any politico who goes off track.
So don’t confuse the issue. Your defense and support of McCain is what is dishonorable.
78 posted on
01/27/2010 12:32:53 PM PST by
Reagan Man
("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson