You must be getting the good ones. The Palin-cult members that ping me are reading a script that tells them not to try to defend her. It says to accuse them of being closet Romney-bots or Ron Paul-bot’s. After declaring guilt with no proof the next step is to claim the non-believer’s points are invalid by default. The reason for this stategy? Infatuation has no argument.
Here's the Palin-cult calender:
December was Romney-conspiracy month, next
January is Paul
February is Huck
March is Rudy
April is Forbes
May is DeMint
...
Get real. You clowns are the ones who are hyperbolic screeching that her endorsement of McCain is all of a sudden going to be the end of her. Rational people know that she's just going on her word and it doesn't mean a thing in the long run nor a change in her conservative philosophy.
When she starts campaigning for other RINOs, then we'll talk.
Infatuation? Tell me, sickofconservatives, I mean sickoflibs, give me a line by line, policy by policy comparison between Palin and any other national leading republican, and prove who is more conservative. And by national leading republican, I mean who is on the stage now, with a national, MSM name, that the majority of Americans would know. I’m waiting...