Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norman Bates
If she’s not offended (obviously since she’s campaigning for him) then why are you?

I throws her judgment into question.

If she either can't judge or doesn't care about the political compatibility of her associates, then her potential as POTUS is cast into doubt.

Supporting McCain would strongly fly in the face of her very popular "rogue" rhetoric. There is NOBODY more "Washington-DC-insider-politics-as-usual" than John McCain. That presents a big credibility problem.

102 posted on 01/26/2010 3:03:58 PM PST by TChris ("Hello", the politician lied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: TChris
I throws her judgment into question.

Right. She endorses and man who catapulted her onto the national stage. It's called charater. Character is much more important than ideology. Good things naturally follow from correct character. Focusing solely on ideology however, uh, not so much.

Hell, you haven't even heard her endorsement yet - it could be tepid as hell. I hope you are shamed.

There is NOBODY more "Washington-DC-insider-politics-as-usual" than John McCain.

LOL - put it away! Say what you want about McCain. Say what you want about his politics. But one thing I know is there is nothing business-as-usual about the guy. There's a reason he's called the Maverick.

That presents a big credibility problem.

The only credibility problem I see is when y'all come running back to her next year. Everyone else, including Scott Brown, has already been eliminated. Either that or Duncan Hunter will be the nominee.

112 posted on 01/26/2010 3:18:46 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson