She’s duly exposed now. That’s for certain.
I’ve pinged you to another serious plot we’re following.
here’s a thought for FReeper sleuthers: “Ellie Light” must have emailed all these “letters”???
b/c if they were sent in snail mail then almost none of them would have had a “local” postmark when received at these dozens of MSM locations?
[assuming (1) that “Ellie Light” did not jet all over the country to all those locations to mail letters with local postmarks all over; and (2) that at least some of all those 40+ papers would actually have someone who pays attention to postmarks of letters to the editor??]
ok, so imagining for a moment that all or most of these “letters” would have been emailed, doesn’t that mean that all of those different papers must have the sender’s IP ADDRESS recorded on their various network/email servers???
I’m no techie but I know I’ve read that blog editors etc. can retain and compare IP addresses when there are issues of strange online happenings??
SO, if all these so-called “news” organizations must have the IP address(es) of sources of these “letters” then it should be rather easy for them to “investigate” the source of these letters if they can be pressured to do so?
I know that liberal MSM will not WANT to find the source of this apparent astroturfing fraud, but perhaps they can be shamed and embarrassed and pressured into doing so from public exposure??
this is all speculative if I’m wrong about the letters being emailed and/or whether IP address records could be accessed from those various “news” organizations......... but if someone here knows how such investigations can be conducted, maybe a focus on IP addresses would help to solve this little mystery??