[kabar]

LOL. Still trotting out that Humphrey interview. I suggest you listen more closely. As a grassroots immigration activist who lobbies on the Hill, I am very attuned to the Orwellian use of language to deceive and fool.

First everyone is in favor of secure borders, including Obama and McCain and Hillary. They all signed the secure fence act.

The litmus test is what do you do with the 12 to 20 million illegal aliens in this country. The Univision interview put Palin on the spot because they understand the issue and the questions to ask.

Palin has not said that she would be against legalizing the status of the illegals or that she would favor deportation/attrition thru enforcement. She is dancing around the subject hoping that people like you would infer something that she has not said. We need to ask her the Univision questions again and see what she says.

[SoCalPol]

I am in San Diego, 20 miles north from the border with Mexico.
I have no problem with what Sarah Palin has to say.

[FreeReign]

Palin has not said that she would be against legalizing the status of the illegals or that she would favor deportation/attrition thru enforcement.

In a December 2009 interview, Sarah said that she was against amnesty.

LARS LARSON: The amnesty proposal that was defeated in Congress — in your view, was that amnesty for illegals and would you back amnesty for a path to citizenship, as the current president calls it?

SARAH PALIN: No, I’m not for amnesty. Let’s ratchet this down quite simply to remember what we’re referring to. Illegal aliens are called “illegal” for a reason. We need to secure our borders and I am not for amnesty. And there are humane ways to deal with the 11-13 million illegal aliens who are in our country right now, but if they’re not going to follow the rules, they need to get out.

Link