Brown is not 100% pro Life. He is mostly pro Life in that he supports most of the pro life agenda items such as partial birth abortion ban, parental notification etc. He is also the 41 vote to kill Obama care which would of made Federal Funding for abortion legal.What he is not willing to do is come out and condemn Abortion.
To claim that he is "pro choice" because he does NOT agree with your personal opinion on Abortion 100% is intellectually dishonest at best.
It is also an example of why your sort of perfectionist dogma is so utterly politically infective. Following your dogam, you would of elected a 100% pro abortion vote to the US Senate because you are too arrogantly wedded to your personal political opinions to actually do the hard dirty compromise work to advace your agenda.
Apparently it is far easier to stand on your stump and scream for perfection,and thus never have to ever actually DO anything, then to actually do the hard dirty political work to fight abortion and save lives.
Johnnie, you’re a lying liberal. The perfect poster boy for today’s formerly grand old party.
Are you going to tell FReepers that Martha Coakley is "mostly pro Life"? Because, as has already been proven with links on this thread, Scott Brown said that his position is the same as hers. Was he lying?