Posted on 01/19/2010 4:36:25 PM PST by Sneakyuser
Yeah your right. Life is first, nothing else matters if you don’t have it.
We don’t and shouldn’t have to support this guy additionally. He’ll be there for awhile. Hey maybe he will do a Romney and become ProLife. What concerns me is where do we point our guns to now, next? I say Barney Frank is a big fat target and his recent statements are going to lose all kinds of support among his fanactical extremeies.
I’d love to have him taken out and replaced by a Conservative.
I hear you. Bawney Frank is an easy target, if you’re willing to toss aside political correctness. Not many people have the guts for that. I say we train our sights on Pelosi and Reid. Keep firing away until they fall.
Yes.
The patriot Robert E. Lee makes for an excellent role model.
My suggestion to you: Go down to a bar on Pearl St. and drown your sorrows.
if you’re willing to toss aside political correctness
///////////////////
You never saw my show on Public Access TV (GRTV)
THE GAY TALIBAN MAN
So, you have a problem with Sarah Palin and you have a problem with Ronald Reagan too.
Yet you call Robert E. Lee, who along with Jefferson Davis, are directly responsible for the deaths of over 600,000 Americans, a hero and a great role model.
Sounds like you have a problem with the United States of America. Then move! I hear South Ameica treats Confederates and Nazis very well and accepts them with open arms.
You need to be in a straight jacket and heavily medicated.
Link? Thanks ;^)
Ronald Reagan is dead.
Yet you call Robert E. Lee, who along with Jefferson Davis, are directly responsible for the deaths of over 600,000 Americans, a hero and a great role model.
Indeed, I do.
Sounds like you have a problem with the United States of America. Then move! I hear South Ameica treats Confederates and Nazis very well and accepts them with open arms.
Who is it that has a problem with the United States of America? At least I don't disrespect the American flag on my profile page.
Still can't get over that defeat in Mass.
how the hell can E Lee be directly responsible for over 600,000 deaths?
It’s like saying any General in a war is responsible for the deaths in the war, it’s just plain stupid
It’s like saying any General in a war is responsible for the deaths in the war, it’s just plain stupid
Good question. The men under Lee's command never numbered more than 80,000, and the total number of deaths in the battles in which he was involved--on both sides--probably came nowhere near 600,000.
You two crackpots should have no problem figuring it out.
Judging from your posts, I would say that you are a twelve-yer-old with a crush on Martha Coakley.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.