Posted on 01/16/2010 7:51:40 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
And yet the F-22 line has been canceled. The Eagle is 40 years old from the drawing board.
Just brilliant.
Pingaroo.
BTTT
Secret paint
yitbos
That plane looks fast just sitting there. Nice looking bird.
And, the F-15 doesn’t have thrust vectoring either.
Aaaaand the F-22 was already in low-rate production, and just starting to pay off development costs. Plus, our closest allies wanted to buy F22s, rather than spend their money on home-grown designs. That says people saw it as a ready-to-fly winner. Now the few we have become "magic bullet" items, and the engines aren't even cranked over without presidential approval.
Iam curious to know how much of a RCS reduction they achieved. Two of the biggest radar reflectors on any aircraft are the cockpit and the turbofan blades.
The cockpit RCS can be reduced by using a radar absorbing canopy. But they are extremely expensive.
The turbofan blades can be hidden using radar absorbing panels inside the engine inlets like on the B1-B. But that would reduce top speed to just above Mach 1 like the B1-B.
Interesting problem, isn’t it?
tradergem
the engines aren’t even cranked over without presidential approval. “”
Is this true?
I would to take a ride in one of these birds...
I would love to take a ride in one of these birds...
They wish to remain as US customer, primarily to ensure they stay under US umbrella.
Willing to use somewhat dated technlogy due to their potential adversary using stone-age weaponry.
In the early days of an air campaign, the Silent Eagle can be outfitted with weapon bays suitable for carrying air-to-air and air-to-ground weapons that would be tucked inside conformal fuel tanks, thus reducing the aircraft’s front-quadrant RCS. The aircraft could then be reconfigured in hours to handle the F-15’s characteristic heavy load of weapons once early threats are removed and sustainment operations begin.
Thats a really nifty idea...But I seriously doubt the “bolt on/bolt off” stealthy attachments would be manipulated that easily...
There has got to be testing and calibration to those attachments that has got to be made before it flies, and to just take them off, just because you think your done with all the “dangerous” missions done is a pipe dream...
Nope, these conformal weapons bays are on for good...And you’d be better off to have a small squadron of these handy for those “special” missions you need flown, and let the other squadrons work issues the traditional way...
Groovy.
Just being sarcastic (I hope). But with this bunch, you can never know.
Did any of you see the National Geographic t.v. show about how they tested the stealthiness of the WWII Horten fighter?
National Geographic got Northrop/Grumman to test the RCS of the Horten fighter in the Smithsonian Instution’s warehouse and then build and test a full scale RCS model at Northrop/Grumman’s RCS test facility.
They showed stuff that up until recently was top secret.
I was very suprised at what they showed.
tradergem
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.