As I’ve posted before, the “fix” in MN resulted in a swing of just 1000 votes. Coleman was up by 300 before the recount; Franken ended up “winning” by 700.
The latest polls show Brown winning by approx. 30,000.
If the polls are accurate, some massive fraud would be necessary to turn that around. Has there ever been an example of such a thing in MA? I’ve checked and was unable to find any election fraud in MA remotely like that.
In Massachusetts, it has been a given that pretty much anybody with a (D) next to their name will win so I really doubt they have the infrastructure or experience to commit voter fraud on a large scale.
I'm pretty sure there are going to be some "dead" people voting and likely some ballot stuffing going on but if Brown is a few percentage points up (30,000+ votes), I don't think he (Brown) has anything to worry about.
BTW, Brown is going to absolutely clobber Coakley in the Boston suburbs and points west. I wouldn't be surprised to see Brown get 70% of the vote in some of the western towns (and out on the Cape). I believe that in order for Martha to pull it out, she's going to need at least 70% of the Boston vote and that's the reason Obama is there today.
We are a small state so Boston cannot be written off by the Brown campaign. If Brown can get 30% or better in Boston, I think it will be pretty much impossible for him to lose.
Want to see the template for voter fraud? Check out the Washington Gubernatorial race of 2004. The folks who orchestrated that are goose-stepping Democrats who are intimately invloved in every close race, and in EVERY instance the Dim candidate, after coming out short at the conclusion of the voting, miraculously “found” votes to “take away” from the victor and votes to “give to” the Dim, thus assuring a Dim victory. To say I hate the left is a profound understatement.