Posted on 01/14/2010 4:43:48 AM PST by tedbel
By Ted Belman
In Appraising Obama’s Foreign Policy: From Hope to Audacity, Zbigniew Brzezinski, described Obama’s, and his, world view which he characterized as “reconnect(ing) the United States with the emerging historical context of the twenty-first century.”
To this end, he writes Obama “has comprehensively reconceptualized U.S. foreign policy with respect to several centrally important geopolitical issues”. I shall comment on each of these in turn.
• Islam is not an enemy, and the “global war on terror” does not define the United States’ current role in the world; This has always been America’s policy. Even Bush 44, with his neocon stalwarts, refused, after 9/11, to identify the enemy as Islam. He avoided naming the enemy by declaring “war on terror”. He went so far as to declare Islam, “a religion of peace”.
What Obama has done differently was to publicly praise Islam, at the expense of truth and to bow down to its titular head, the King of Saudi Arabia. He has moved from tolerance to overt partnership.
But a form of partnership has existed between Britain, US and the Arab oil interests ever since last century’s thirties. The British worked with the Arabs in the Middle East to thwart Germany’s expansion there all at the expense of Jewish settlement rights. In the late seventies Britain, with the complicity of the US brought about the downfall of the Shah because the Shah wanted to have an independent oil policy and not one controlled by Britain.
According to “A Century Of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order”, by William Engdahl, a German historian.
Their scheme was based on a detailed study of the phenomenon of Islamic fundamentalism, as presented by British Islamic expert, Dr. Bernard Lewis,
(Excerpt) Read more at israpundit.com ...
Zbigniew Brzezinski, Carter’s former National Security Advisor, should be facing an indictment for inciting genocide due to his actions in the Spring of 1980 when he traveled to Amman Jordan and met with representatives of Saddam’s regime for the purpose of indicating that the U.S. would not be heartbroken if Iraq were to engage Iran militarily on the basis of disputed borders, territories, etc., this was a ham-handed attempted to put ‘pressure’ on the Assahollah Khomeini, as Iran was still holding our embassy personnel hostage. Thus, Brzezinski (acting on Carter’s behalf) instigated the Iraq-Iran War of over 8 years duration.
Brzezinski and U.S. intelligence had been setting up Saddam as a sucker for well over a year, after it suddenly dawned on Jimmy the Buffoon that after stabbing the Shah in the back, that the U.S. had NO truly reliable allies in the Middle East save Israel, and ordered a ‘review’ of U.S. relations with Iraq. So when the leftists and America-haters trot out that picture of Donald Rumsfeld meeting with Saddam Hussein, remind them that it was that asswipe Jimmy Carter who tilted U.S. policy in favor of Iraq in the wake of the Assahollah seizing Iran (again due to Carter’s utter incompetence and malfeasance).
Brzezinski is as close to a true Dr Strangelove as has ever been seen roaming the corridors of political power.
The Big Zbig is coming on his daughter’s TV show — right now. I am always fascinated (and appalled) to listen to people whose heads are so far into the clouds, you could swear those heads were in their patoots.
At their core, they are utopians, eliminating at a whim the thousands of human variables we variously know as “evil”, and then, from those false premises, spin ephemeral webs of fantasy.
In the first 45 seconds of his intro, he has already mentioned the word “collective” 3 times! Can’t change the stripes.
He is now ascribing the differences between Haiti and the Dominican Rep to “Pure Luck”. It’s hard for him to tell the truth, as that would be a violation of political correctness.
...thats my impersonation of the lovely and talented Mika.
Does this guy have a clue? From where does he come from?
What kind of education did he get?
How can one be so out of touch and pretend to give advices to US political leaders?
That guy make no difference between islam and christianism!
Does he know what he is talking about? Obviously NOT!
He is a Communist.
Just the opposite, they are Realists/Pragmatists. It is the NeoCons, that Zbig points out as influencing GW Bush, who are the Idealists/Utopians.
And it is not just Realist Zbig who is influencing Obama, all Realist are advising Obama and endorsing his policies.
Obama's four wise old men are Kissinger, Scowcroft, Baker, and Zbig.
It thrills many to hear Cheney say Obama is dithering, but Obama was listening to Realist Colin Powell say take your time and follow the Powell Doctrine.
Just like the differences between North and South Korea are due to pure luck? Or the differences between the Arab countries and The West? Or San Diego and Tijuana?
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
International communism = globalist
ZBrig was one of the back room handlers for an unknown candidate named Jimmy Carter. He then repeated the same trick for an unknown candidate named Barack Obama. He is a founding member of the Trilateral Commission which wants to usher in a global government through a North America, Europe, and Asia structure based on economic interdependence. Our current foreign policy is remarkably similar to his plans outlined in “The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives” which was published in 1998.
None of this is a conspiracy. It is done out in the open with published writings explaining exactly what they are going to do next. All one has to do is pick up ZBrig’s books and compare it to current events.
What Obama has done differently was to publicly praise Islam, at the expense of truth and to bow down to its titular head, the King of Saudi Arabia. He has moved from tolerance to overt partnership.Nope, he's submitted -- because he *is* a Moslem. Thanks tedbel.
“ZBrig was one of the back room handlers for an unknown candidate named Jimmy Carter. He then repeated the same trick for an unknown candidate named Barack Obama.”
How is it that guys like ZBig get to have a prime part in choosing our next president?
His fingerprints are all over the globalist gov’t agenda and it amazes me how this guy is such a power broker. How could he still maintain that kind of influence?
His fingerprints are all over the globalist gov’t agenda and it amazes me how this guy is such a power broker. How could he still maintain that kind of influence?
To delve into those answers we are quickly heading into the hallowed halls of conspiracy theory. You will find that all the mover and shakers show up to the same major events and constantly work in the background to run things. They are all globalists and strongly desire a world government and currency as that simplifies everything for them.
As time goes on they are slowly coming out of the shadows as they cannot keep a media blackout in place anymore as their MSM minions are no longer considered relevant. Thanks to the alternative media we now have documented pictures and articles that one of these annual planning meetings does actually take place (Bilderberg Group). I would also recommend looking at “Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making” which came out in 2008 from a reputable academic author.
Follow the money, follow the interconnections on muckety-muck, follow the decision makers, and you will see that the same guys and gals in the background are always involved in providing the smoke and mirrors that the general public views as random outcomes of who gets selected to run our country. That is why TARP went through, that is why the exact same people (the A or B team) end up running our country regardless of which party wins the presidential election. A good historian with access to an informational database could easily connect the dots for the public on all of these individuals (including ZBrig) but you will never see that done. Then again, no one would believe the historian and probably label him a tin-foil hat kook.
“To delve into those answers we are quickly heading into the hallowed halls of conspiracy theory. “
True ‘dat. I’ve got my tinfoil hat firmly in place. :)
I suppose it’s been going on for all of history, in one sense or another. The Robber Barons of the late 19th century helped form gov’t policies that enriched themselves and people in gov’t, and they managed to get some willing dupes like Woodrow Wilson (the original Jimmy Carter) to go along with them in creating new ways to take money from the populace.
Here’s some interesting quotes from history:
http://www.apfn.org/THEWINDS/library/money.html
“The system of banking [is] a blot left in all our Constitutions, which, if not covered, will end in their destruction... I sincerely believe that banking institutions are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity... is but swindling futurity on a large scale.”
- Thomas Jefferson
How true his words were.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.