[Zionist Conspirator]

He may be a crank, but he’s consistent in his crankery. Anywhere there’s human misery — after 9/11, after Katrina, even after Ariel Sharon’s stroke — Reverend Pat will be there to explain to the victims why they deserved it. (And he’s not the only one.) He’s taking a beating on Twitter right now for having said this, including/especially from Christians who don’t want to see the faith smeared by his latest Old Testament thunderbolt theory. No worries there: Other Christian leaders, starting with the Pope and Franklin Graham, are taking a more New Testament view. But even conceding that he doesn’t speak for most Christians, he does still command a sizable following, no? Even after years of barfing up stuff like this.

And naturally the "new testament view" is so far superior to that pathetic "old testament," right? No wonder after two thousand years of following the first hippie western civilization is in such a mess.

So . . . if the "old testament" is so meeeean, why are Jews so liberal?

[yarddog]

Jesus was no hippie. He also said every thing, even every dot and period in the scriptures was accurate. He was of course referring to the Jewish scriptures since the New Testament did not exist at the time.

[Vanders9]

And naturally the "new testament view" is so far superior to that pathetic "old testament," right?

Got it in one. God's progressive revelation.

No wonder after two thousand years of following the first hippie western civilization is in such a mess.

That would be the western civilisation whose technology and social advancement soared above every other culture on the planet, and spread its ideals, idealogy and values to every corner of the globe? The one that embraced Christianity, right?

So . . . if the "old testament" is so meeeean, why are Jews so liberal?

Because they're @^%$&$ stupid and bite the hand that feeds them?