Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stillonaroll

I think that “Ms.” bit is part of the Times’s regular style manual.


77 posted on 01/11/2010 1:35:43 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker
I think that “Ms.” bit is part of the Times’s regular style manual.

------------------------------------------------------------

I'm sure it is, and it ticks me off. It's politically correct leftist crap. In leftspeak, a woman is not "defined" by whether or not she is married, so the title cannot refer to her marital status.

Kind of like how they use BCE instead of BC: liberals trying to expunge Christ from history.

87 posted on 01/11/2010 2:10:27 PM PST by stillonaroll (Nominate a non-RINO in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: 9YearLurker; stillonaroll

Yep, it’s standard NYT “etiquette” to always refer to women as Ms.


116 posted on 01/11/2010 6:59:54 PM PST by Tamar1973 (Freedom of the Press?! I need Freedom FROM THE PRESS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson