Scott Brown on Hannity tonight (01/08/2009)

www.foxnews.com ^ | 01/08/2009

[GOPsterinMA]

Scott Brown on Hannity tonight (01/08/2009)

[Reagan Man]

Looks like I struck a nerve tonight. GOOD!

>>>>>Your position can be better described as conservative fundamentalist.

Sounds good to me, troll. I prefer conservative Constitutionalist. Either way there are many of us on FR and we've been here for years. That includes the Founder. FRee Republic is a pro-life conservative forum. We don't support liberals or rinos, period! Scott Brown sounded like a wishy-washy moderate on Hannity tonight.

As for Reagan's 11th commandment, it was a fallacy. Reagan engaged in hardcore politics his entire career. In 1976 he almost took down a sitting GOP President by calling Ford's policies worthless and destructive.

Now get informed and grow up.

[WVKayaker]

Troll? You're the one going from thread to thread shouting down conservatives with whom you disagree. You don't speak for Free Republic, nor for Jim Thompson. I've been around for years, too. 62 of them so far, and counting. What you should be saying is that YOU don't support Scott Brown.

My quote was from Ron Reagan's mouth. Get informed and grow up yourself. Blinder issue politics has gotten us Zero and crew! No thanks, troll!

Almost is only good in horseshoes and hand grenades...

[Reagan Man]

>>>>>Troll?

Got that right.

>>>>>You don't speak for Free Republic, nor for Jim Thompson.

ALL good FReepers speak for FRee Republic. You may not like what you hear. I couldn't care less. When you run around spewing BS and favoring some pro-abortion politico, I'm gonna be in your face. Count on it.

[WVKayaker]

ALL good FReepers speak for FRee Republic.

We're good FReepers, and I disagree. You are a troll, in deed. BS must be your middle name.

You can be in my face if you come over the mountain. I'll be glad to offer you an adult beverage and discuss it like men. But, of course, that would void the anonymity of being a troll. Pontification will surely get you heard, but won't get you any points.

I already support Scott Brown, and I will make another donation in your name after this post. I also Support Sarah Palin, and I sent money to NY in last fall's fiasco. True FReepers would do the same to get rid of Dimocrats and rogues. Electability IS the issue. Count on that!

12:15 EST- SCOTT'S ON HANNITY NOW!

Try to remember my screen name, though. I appreciate the extra attention. Free rent is always good! My last freebie lasted for days.

[Reagan Man]

LOL You don't act like you're 62. You act more like a 12 year old.

>>>>>You can be in my face if you come over the mountain.

Those are foothills in WV, bucko. Come out to the Rockies and I'll buy you a beer... sorry.. make that a coke. You're allowed to drink pop, aren't you?

>>>>>Try to remember my screen name, though.

You're already on FR's troll watch list.

[Jet Jaguar]

The choices in the race are Coakley, a Very liberal dem with ACORN backing and the Kennedy family backing.

Scott Brown, a state senator who is mostly Conservative, with a few drawbacks.

The last choice is a libertarian named Joseph L. Kennedy, (no relation).

You can look up their positions and decide you would not vote for any of them.

You probably would not. But, some of us here would like to see the seat that has been held for 50+ years by a dem change status.

Brown is the only viable candidate to get this done.

I support him. I ask others to support him. This is not a FR position. This is my own position.

I would support a more Conservative candidate if one existed. None exists.

Brown could take the seat from the dems and possibly stop health control in its’ tracks.

FReegards,

JJ

[Jet Jaguar]

No response to 66.

Thanks for the ping.

[RnMKicks]

Here’s the entire quote:

Abortion
While this decision should ultimately be made by the woman in consultation with her doctor, I believe we need to reduce the number of abortions in America. I believe government has the responsibility to regulate in this area and I support parental consent and notification requirements and I oppose partial birth abortion. I also believe there are people of good will on both sides of the issue and we ought to work together to support and promote adoption as an alternative to abortion.

Anyone who would torpedo Brown and let Coakley, who supports taxpayer funded abortion, sail to victory needs to WAKE UP!

[MataHarley]

Scott Brown is not against O’health care... save for convenient talking points. He plainly states he believes all Americans are “entitled” (per the Hannity interview) and “deserve” (per his website) health care. He’s also a Romney care supporter. He believes in the mandates, just disagrees with some of the o’healthcare details. The heart of the plan is A-OK with him. Can you say compromise bunny?

Per the Hannity interview, Brown believes that since MA has already got Romney care, they (MA) do not need to pay for the rest of the nation’s road to the same. Instead, the rest of the states need to follow MA down Romney’s road.

Brown is a prime Dem compromise candidate on liberal issues. His energy and gun stance is questionable, via his own website. One must guess what “reasonable” regulation of gun ownership is, as well as “reasonable and appropriate development of alternative energy sources “ that protects open spaces and prevents pollution. Perfect example, he... like Romney... opposes the Cape Wind farm off Martha’s Vineyard, saying it’s like putting turbines in the Grand Canyon. Romney and ol Ted joined forces to oppose that one for potential property value declines for the rich and famous. Scott Brown is right there with ‘em... Romney Jr.

Simply stated, Brown is another RINO... or Republican/MA style. Might be the best you can pull from that state, but a far cry from conservative.

The only gain here is the coup of usurping a long held Kennedy seat legacy, losing out to the GOP. It’s a GOP merit badge, if that’s enough to float your boat. But expect little from his performance other than being another MA RINO as a Congressional member. Sorry if that’s not enough to get me excited.

Look to LTC Allen West in Florida, if you want the profile of a conservative, ex-military man.

[Reagan Man]

Candidates like Scott Brown --- "I'm a Scott Brown Republican" --- are the enemy within and do nothing to advance conservatism. If a candidate can't defend our most fundamental Constitutional right to life, then he/she isn't someone worth supporting or voting for.

Brown is a Romney clone and supported goevernment mandated and taxpayer subsidized, RomneyCare! So, WAKE UP yourself.

[SoCalPol]

Nice try.
One of the FR people who would rather see a democrat win to push Obama’s agenda with amnesty which Brows is against.

Don’t bitch when the Senate votes for each of Obama’s Left Wing disasters.

some FReepers would rather have all Democrats so they have something to keep posting and rip about.

[Fiji Hill]

Brown is a Romney clone and supported goevernment mandated and taxpayer subsidized, RomneyCare! So, WAKE UP yourself.

So what should Freepers do about the election? Instead of condemning, make some recommendations.

[Reagan Man]

Since I don’t vote for liberals or rinos, I would suggest they don’t vote Scott Brown.

Btw, stalking me on different threads is another forum no no.

[Fiji Hill]

Since I don’t vote for liberals or rinos, I would suggest they don’t vote Scott Brown.

I figure most Freepers will realize that although Scott Brown isn't perfect, he's a hell of a lot better than Coakley.

Btw, stalking me on different threads is another forum no no.

Forum "no-nos" ought to include personal attacks and name-calling (lunatic, moron, slavocrat, etc.)--which for some, strange reason tend to generate stalking.

[Reagan Man]

>>>>>I figure most Freepers will realize that although Scott Brown isn't perfect, he's a hell of a lot better than Coakley.

Not if you're a pro-life, limited govt conservative. That's the whole point. Principle trumps political expediency for us conservatives and we don't support statists.

>>>>>Forum "no-nos" ought to include ...

Tell ya what, bucko. People stop acting like lunatics and morons and stop promoting 145 year old dead ideologies, and I'll get civil. Otherwise, I'm in your face.

[Fiji Hill]

and stop promoting 145 year old dead ideologies

Are you referring to the Radical Republicans of the 1860's? You won't find too many of them on this board.

[Reagan Man]

I’m talking about you Slavocrats. Silly!

[Fiji Hill]

If anyone is a slavocrat, it’s you, not I. There are no quotations from members of the Southern slave-holding elite on my profile page.

[Reagan Man]

LOL You have a point. Albeit minor.

The fact is Washington, Adams, Jefferson and the others never tried to succeed from the Union.

Your heroes, Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee and the other Slavocrats, started the rift that started the Civil War. Davis, Lee and the other southern confederates wanted to see slavery expanded. They were the traitors.

[Fiji Hill]

Your heroes, Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee and the other Slavocrats, started the rift that started the Civil War

When did I ever call Jefferson Davis a hero?

And as for Robert E. Lee, I agree with this tribute offered by former Sen. Ben H. Hill (D-Ga.):

"He possessed every virtue of other great commanders without their vices. He was a foe without hate; a friend without treachery; a victor without oppression, and a victim without murmuring. He was a public officer without vices; a private citizen without reproach; a Christian without hypocrisy and a man without guile. He was a Caesar without his ambition; Frederick without his tyranny; Napoleon without his selfishness, and Washington without his reward. He was obedient to authority as a servant, and loyal in authority as a true king. He was gentle as a woman in life; modest and pure as a virgin in thought; watchful as a Roman vital in duty; submissive to law as Socrates, and grand in battle as Achilles!"

By the way, Teddy Roosevelt and Winston Churchill also admired Lee. Does that make them "slavocrats"?

If I am a "slavocrat" because I admire Lee, then you are a pro-abort because your hero is the California governor who, five years before Roe v. Wade, signed into law a bill that legalized abortion.